The Philippines Deserve Respect To Take Maritime Claim With China To UN Tribunal

Commentary: Vietnamese people are amazed with respect and admiration by the recent actions taken by the Filipino government to bring the maritime claim in the West Philippines/ South China Sea/ East to the UN’s Arbitral Tribunal for arbitration. China and the Philippines are signatory countries of the 1982 UNCLOS.

China has been bullying its small neighboring countries over the past 20 years and has recently escalated its aggressions in South China Sea to the point that an armed conflict can occur at any moment. China has been using the propaganda line that “China has indisputable sovereignty over the islands in South China Sea and its adjacent waters.”

Time for China as a second superpower, second economy of the world, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, to behave as a civilized country of the 21st century.

Time has come for China present its legal and historical evidences of its sovereignty of its claim rather than practicing the gunboat policy of the 19th century. Chinese civilization is one of the oldest ones of mankind and has the oldest recorded history. It should be able to produce the legal and historical evidences rather than some ceramic debris or fecal DNA.

Taking a legal action with China is courageous act as China has history of economic retaliation against the country in the dispute. However, sometimes a stand should be taken against bullying despite consequences. President Aquino and its government deserves admiration for defending the righteous interests of their nation.



This legal action will show whether China is willing to be a respectable superpower in the new era and will comply to its commitments with the world.

92 million Filipinos will not be alone, 10 million Filipino dispora, 90 million Vietnamese and 4.5 million overseas Vietnamese will stand with you against the big bully. For instance, Vietnamese intelligentsia supports the Philippines in Scarborough Shoal standoff. Moreover, Vietnam has numerous ancient Chinese documents that refute the current China’s claim.

__________________________________________________________________

The Philippines has taken the step of bringing China before an Arbitral Tribunal under Article 287 and Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) “in order to achieve a peaceful and durable solution to the dispute over the West Philippine Sea (WPS).”

The Philippines has taken China to a United Nations arbitration tribunal to challenge Beijing’s claim to most of the South China Sea, which the Philippines refers to as the West Philippine Sea, and compel it to respect the Philippines’ right to its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and stop Chinese incursions into areas in the disputed waters claimed by the Philippines.

SouthchinaSeaAFP The Philippines Deserve Respect To Take Maritime Claim With China To UN Tribunal

Greedy and illegal claim of the whole sea as China’s lake.

The Philippines initiated the compulsory proceedings against China as provided for under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos), and asked the UN to declare the Chinese “nine-dash line” outlining its claim to most of the South China Sea, including waters and islands close to its neighbours, as invalid and illegal.

DFA The Philippines Deserve Respect To Take Maritime Claim With China To UN Tribunal

Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario speaks during a media briefing at the foreign affairs headquarters in Manila.

It demands that China “desist from unlawful activities that violate the sovereign rights and jurisdiction of the Philippines under the 1982 Unclos”.

“The Philippines has taken the step of bringing China before the Arbitral Tribunal… in order to achieve a peaceful and durable solution to the dispute over the West Philippine Sea,” Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario told a press briefing yesterday.

“The Philippines has exhausted almost all political and diplomatic avenues for a peaceful negotiated settlement of its maritime dispute with China… we hope that the arbitral proceedings shall bring this dispute to a durable solution,” he said.

Del Rosario did not take questions. The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) instead issued a question-and-answer statement to reporters.

Allies not involved

The DFA said the move was a decision of the Philippines alone. It said its major allies, the United States and Japan, had nothing to do with the legal action.

It said the action was “in defence of our national territory and maritime domain”.

In a “notification and statement of claim” filed before the UN, the Philippine government said the arbitration was not seeking to declare who owns which islands in the disputed waters.

“The Philippines does not seek in this arbitration a determination of which party enjoys sovereignty over the islands claimed by both of them. Nor does it request a delimitation of any maritime boundaries,” the government said.

In its submission, the Philippines asked the UN to compel China to respect the Philippines’ rights to exclusively explore and exploit resources within its EEZ and continental shelf as declared under Unclos, citing recent Chinese actions that constituted an excessive exercise of sovereignty over disputed territories.

It asked the UN to declare that the Philippines is entitled, as provided for by Unclos, to “12 nautical miles of territorial sea, 200 nautical miles of EEZ and established boundaries of its continental shelf from the baselines”.

The Philippines ratified the 1982 convention in 1984 and China in 1996, but the two countries have conflicting interpretations of its provisions, especially on the scope of exclusive economic zones.

“China’s nine-dash line claim encompasses practically the entire West Philippine Sea. We must challenge the unlawful claim of China… in order to protect our national territory and maritime domain,” the DFA said in a statement.

“We hope that the arbitral tribunal will issue an award in accordance with international law that will direct China to respect our sovereign rights and jurisdiction over our EEZ, continental shelf, contiguous zone and territorial sea over the West Philippine Sea, and to desist from undertaking unlawful acts that violate our rights,” it said.

Beijing envoy summoned

Chinese Ambassador Ma Keqing was summoned at 1pm to the DFA yesterday where she was handed a note verbale furnishing China with a copy of the Philippines’ “notification and statement of claim” before the UN.

In the document, the DFA told China that it had decided to seek arbitral proceedings “to clearly establish sovereign rights and jurisdiction of the Philippines over its maritime entitlements in the West Philippine Sea”.

The Chinese Embassy in Manila promptly restated Beijing’s claim to the contested waters and insisted on its position that claimants settle the dispute through negotiations.

In a statement, it said that Ma, on receiving the note verbale, had “reiterated the principled position of the Chinese side, and stressed that China has indisputable sovereignty over the islands in South China Sea and its adjacent waters,” the embassy said in a statement.

“The Chinese side strongly holds the disputes on South China Sea should be settled by parties concerned through negotiations,” it said.

Increasing assertiveness

China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea overlap those of the Philippines as well as Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and Taiwan.

Over the past two years, the Philippines and Vietnam have complained at China’s increasing assertiveness in enforcing those claims, particularly around areas believed to be rich in oil and natural gas reserves.

The Philippines earlier protested a string of incidents involving China in the West Philippine Sea, including sea patrols, oil exploration, military exercises and the establishment of a Chinese administrative unit to govern all of the disputed Spratly Islands.

It has filed at least 15 protests against China for incursions into the disputed waters, Del Rosario has said.

Through the compulsory arbitration, the Philippine government is asking the UN to declare that China had prevented the Philippines from exploiting resources within its EEZ and continental shelf. Instead, China has itself used these resources, violating international law, the government said.

The action also asks the world body to declare that China has violated the Philippines’ right to freely navigate the disputed waters.

The Philippines also hopes the UN will prompt China to “bring its domestic legislation into conformity with its obligations under Unclos”.

The Philippines has a standing protest against a maritime policing law of China’s Hainan province which has allowed its police to intercept, board and inspect foreign vessels sailing into the West Philippine Sea.

The legal action also asks the UN to compel China to stop preventing Philippine vessels from exploring and exploiting Scarbourough Shoal—a formation much closer to the Philippines’ coast than to China’s shores that was the site of a standoff between the two countries last year—and Johnson Reef, which are both known to be rich in oil, mineral and marine resources.

It also asks the UN to declare that Mischief Reef and McKennan Reef within the disputed waters as submerged features of the Philippine continental shelf and thus should not be occupied by China.

Finally, it asks the UN to bar Chinese occupation and construction activities on submerged features within the West Philippine Sea.

From 3 to 4 years

The arbitration will be held at an overseas location to be agreed by the two parties.

According to Unclos provisions on arbitration, the adversarial parties would be entitled to nominate their representatives to the five-member arbitration panel, to be “drawn up and maintained” by the UN secretary general.

The Philippines has appointed Judge Rudiger Wolfrum, a German international law expert and justice at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, as a member of the panel.

Solicitor General Francis Jardeleza will serve as the Philippines’ counsel in the proceedings.

With a report from AFP

 

This entry was posted in East Sea Dispute, International, Law, Role model. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>